How effective were greatswords against armor?
>He puts it a bit too general, but against full plate armor, swords are nearly useless. A sword may not be an ideal weapon against an armored opponent, but half-swording with one is still very effective... Also its important to note, the sword pedagogically-speaking is the root weapon of HEMA systems.Are Greatswords effective in real life?
How effective are longswords and great swords in actual combat? Well, I'd say at a basic level, they were effective enough that men whose lives depended on personal violence kept using them right up until they started using guns instead. That's a pretty strong testament to effectiveness in my book.Were greatswords ever actually used?
Famous Greatswords in History. Greatswords were formidable weapons employed in various combat situations, such as defending castle or town walls, engaging in single combats, and protecting standards or banners. In the 16th century, German Landsknechts famously used them to disrupt and break up enemy pike formations.Were longswords effective against armor?
Plate armor was an effective defensive gear perfect for countering many weapons throughout history. The sword was a bladed-edged weapon that had to evolve into a specialized blade type. While it might have lacked brute force, the sword had high versatility, which made it a threat to plate-armored opponents.Were Zweihanders effective?
The zweihander's size makes it an excellent weapon for breaking defenses such as shields and pike formations. The psychological effect of such a large blade likely also plays a part in influencing the outcome of a fight.How much does armour slow you down when fighting with a Greatsword?
Why did the Swiss outlaw Zweihanders?
The two-handed sword was considered incompatible with the pike and was actually outlawed as a frontline weapon by many confederation members--though the Swiss kept making them. The two-hander remained a popular weapon among many other European mercenaries, in Italy and particularly in Germany." (William J.Were spears more effective than swords?
It is said that you can train a Spearman in a week to beat even expert Swordsmen (with years of training) regularly. Spears / Polearms were cheaper to manufacture, more effective in the battlefield, and easier to teach. Swords were more of a "city personal defense weapon", very similar to pistols today.Are Greatswords good against armor?
In the late Middle Ages, when plate armour became increasingly common, people started using weapons with better armour-piercing capabilities, like maces, warhammers and various polearms. Swords are great against lightly armoured and unarmoured targets, like peasants, archers and civilians.Were katanas sharper than longswords?
Western swords were indeed sharp, if not as sharper than the katana. The reason why katanas are known for their sharpness is because of the hard edges they have. This allows them to retain sharpness better than Western swords, which have a softer edge.Were warhammers effective against armor?
It became somewhat of a necessity in combat when armor became so strong that swords and axes were no longer able to pierce and ricocheted upon impact. The war hammer could inflict significant damage on the enemy through their heavy impact without the need to pierce the armor.What was the largest greatsword ever used?
The largest examples were likely either the Japanese Ōdachi, Scottish Claymore or German Zweihänder, all of which reportedly reached lengths of more than 2 m (6 ft 6 in) in combat use.Are curved greatswords faster than greatswords?
Because of the attack angles, these weapons still have slightly less range than their traditional Greatsword counterparts, but they are still faster, which makes them effective against enemy groups.Were claymores effective?
The claymore was not the biggest of the European broadswords – a huge lethal-looking sixteenth-century blade from Switzerland or Germany in the Fitzwilliam makes it look almost tame by comparison. But it was a brutally efficient weapon, as a contemporary account of the battle of Killiecrankie, 1689, testifies.When did greatswords stop being used?
The Goliath Fechtbuch (1510) shows an intermediate form between longsword and Zweihänder. This represented the final stage in the trend of making very large swords, which started in the 14th century, and ended in the 16th century.How heavy were medieval greatswords?
As leading sword expert Ewart Oakeshott unequivocally stated: "Medieval Swords are neither unwieldably heavy nor all alike - the average weight of any one of normal size is between 2.5 lb. and 3.5 lbs. Even the big hand-and-a-half 'war' swords rarely weigh more than 4.5 lbs.What is the most lethal sword design?
Deadliest swords in history
- The claymore, the longsword, and William Wallace.
- The katana and Masamune: Japan's greatest sword smith.
- Para 3: Saladin's singing scimitar.
Why are katanas so brittle?
But when people talk about Katanas being brittle is because the edge is martensite which is a very hard form in steel however can be more brittle than other forms of steel, while the soft back does help it the sword not break a lot of times it is not enough to stop the blade from chipping.Would a greatsword break a katana?
It's not supposed to happen but it did sometimes. Japanese swords vary. Most are a bit harder than the average European sword, and while hardness helps with sharpness it also makes a blade more brittle.How effective were maces against armor?
During the Middle Ages metal armour such as mail protected against the blows of edged weapons. Solid metal maces and war hammers proved able to inflict damage on well armoured knights, as the force of a blow from a mace is great enough to cause damage without penetrating the armour.Were Zweihanders used in combat?
Uses & Roles of the ZweihänderDesigned to be versatile and effective, its primary function is to fight close pike formations in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. Here are some of its uses: Blade : Cutting and thrusting.
How effective were polearms?
Polearms were common weapons on post-classical battlefields of Asia and Europe. Their range and impact force made them effective weapons against armoured warriors on horseback, unhorsing the opponent and to some extent effective to penetrate armour.Why did Roman soldiers use swords instead of spears?
Facing highly effective Iberian warriors in the armies of their enemy Carthage, the Romans soon realized that the short, double-edged and pointed sword possessed many advantages. At close quarters it was an effective stabbing weapon, as well as having a slashing capability.How effective was a halberd?
Halberds had several advantages. Firstly, the length of the shaft allowed the axe mounted on it to be wielded with such strength that its blade could pierce metal, even the armour of the knights in many cases. The hook behind the axe was particularly effective when facing a charge of horseback attackers.Why did knights use swords instead of hammers?
The sword was a secondary weapon, a side-arm, something they'd have in their hip just in case they, for whatever reason, lost their hammer or polearm. because the majority of the combatants they faced wore little to no armor.
← Previous question
How does linking Fortnite accounts work?
How does linking Fortnite accounts work?
Next question →
What's the difference between PSN and PS Plus?
What's the difference between PSN and PS Plus?