Which tank has never been destroyed?
The Challenger 2 main battle tank was famously considered undefeated by enemy fire for decades, having seen extensive service in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Iraq without a loss, but this changed in 2023 when one was destroyed in Ukraine by Russian forces, marking its first confirmed loss in combat. Other tanks, like the American M1 Abrams, have also maintained a strong record, with some sources claiming no Abrams have been lost to enemy tanks, though some losses occurred from other causes like IEDs or friendly fire.Why was the T-35 tank a failure?
Often called a "land battleship", it was the only five-turreted heavy tank in the world to reach production, but proved to be slow and mechanically unreliable. Most of the T-35 tanks still operational at the time of Operation Barbarossa were lost due to mechanical failure rather than enemy action.Has a M1 Abrams ever been destroyed?
Yes, M1 Abrams tanks have been destroyed, notably in Ukraine by Russian drones/missiles and in the Gulf War (mostly from friendly fire or intentional destruction to prevent capture), as well as by ISIS in Iraq, proving vulnerable when hit in weaker spots like the rear or belly with potent anti-tank weapons, though their design helps crew survival.Why is Tiger 131 so famous?
In April 1943, Tiger 131 was fought to a standstill and abandoned in Tunisia; the first Tiger to be captured intact by the Western Allies, it was an important prize.What tank did the Germans fear the most?
The German tank most feared by the Allies during World War II was the Tiger I (Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger Ausf. E), due to its near-impenetrable frontal armor, devastating 88mm gun, and the intense propaganda surrounding it, creating a legendary "fear factor" that often halted Allied advances even before the Tiger appeared. However, while feared for its power, the Panther tank (Panzerkampfwagen V Panther) was also highly respected by German tankers themselves, especially for its superior sloped armor and firepower, often cited by veterans as more effective in combat than the temperamental Tiger.Challenger 2: The UK tank that's never been destroyed by the enemy
Could a Tiger tank beat an Abrams?
Yes, a Tiger tank could destroy an Abrams, but only under extremely specific, lucky circumstances like a close-range ambush hitting the weaker side/rear armor, because the Abrams' superior optics, fire control, speed, and frontal armor make it overwhelmingly dominant in a fair fight. The Tiger's 88mm gun might penetrate the Abrams' side hull at medium range, but the Abrams' advanced systems and much faster firing rate (shooting several Tigers before they get a good shot off) give it a decisive edge.Can a T-72 destroy an Abrams?
Yes, a T-72 can destroy an Abrams, especially if it hits vulnerable spots like the turret ring, side armor, or rear, or if it's a modern T-72 variant with advanced ammo like the T-72B3 hitting a Ukrainian Abrams, but it's difficult and depends heavily on model, range, terrain, crew skill, and ammunition. While the Abrams generally outperforms older T-72s with superior optics and frontal armor, a well-placed shot from a modern T-72 can still knock out an Abrams, turning a difficult fight for the T-72 into a kill for the Abrams.How many tanks has the A-10 destroyed?
During the forty-day conflict, the A-10 force was credited with destroying 987 tanks, 926 artillery pieces, 1,355 combat vehicles, and a range of other targets-including ten fighters on the ground and two helicopters shot down in air-to-air engagements.What tank went 104 mph?
However the M1932 was completed. In 1932 the Army officially clocked this tank (without tracks) at 104 mph.What was the worst tank ever built?
There's no single "worst" tank, but strong contenders include the Bob Semple (NZ's makeshift tractor tank), the unreliable Soviet T-35 (multi-turreted landship), Germany's massive but impractical Panzer Maus, Japan's undergunned Type 95 Ha-Go, Britain's problematic A38 Valiant, and the flawed US M3 Lee/Grant, all notorious for design flaws, poor performance, or unreliability.Why didn't the Germans copy the T-34?
The Weapons Department held that Germany would have difficulty copying the T-34 as Guderian had suggested, because of the quantity of steel alloy and diesel engines required.What did the Germans think of the Sherman?
The Germans viewed the M4 Sherman with mixed feelings: they nicknamed it the "Tommy Cooker" due to its tendency to catch fire, acknowledging its weak armor against their powerful guns, but respected its reliability, mobility, and mass production, using captured ones extensively for its robust engine and useful support features like the high-explosive shells for infantry. While German tank crews feared its sheer numbers, a single German heavy tank (Tiger/Panther) could often defeat multiple Shermans at range, though the Sherman's stabilizer and good optics helped its crews.What was the scariest tank in WWII?
Germany's Tiger tank, whether in the form of the Tiger I or later Tiger II (King Tiger), was the most feared tank of WWII.What was the #1 killer in WWI?
By far, artillery was the biggest killer in World War I, and provided the greatest source of war wounded.What did Germans think of the Churchill tank?
It criticized the Churchill as being weakly armed with obsolete, ineffective weapons, equipped with tracks that broke easily and armor plating of poor quality. However, only two of the 29 tanks were penetrated by the German antitank guns, despite numerous hits on many of them.What killed the most tanks in WWII?
The most effective tank destroyers in WWII were a combination of dedicated anti-tank (A/T) guns, often concealed, alongside tank-on-tank combat and air attacks, with a significant portion of German tank losses attributed to mechanical failures and poor maintenance, especially later in the war, rather than solely enemy fire. Allied firepower (gunfire, mines, rockets) and terrain also caused major losses, but hidden anti-tank guns proved deadly, while aircraft numbers were often exaggerated in initial reports.What's replacing the A-10 Warthog?
There's no single, direct "replacement" for the iconic A-10 Warthog; instead, the U.S. Air Force is using a mix of advanced multi-role fighters like the F-35A Lightning II, newer F-15EX Eagle IIs, and upgraded F-16s, alongside light attack aircraft like the A-29 Super Tucano, to cover its Close Air Support (CAS) roles, focusing on stealth, speed, and precision for different threats, although ground troops still miss the A-10's unique loitering and firepower, particularly its powerful cannon.Which US plane has never been shot down?
McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle.Why is Russia not using the T-14 tank?
Last year, the CEO of Russia's state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec claimed that the T-14's role in Ukraine has been limited since it is “too valuable.” Sergey Chemezov added that the latest Russian MBT is the most “revolutionary tank in a decade.”What tank can survive a nuke?
No tank can guarantee surviving a direct nuclear blast, but the Soviet Object 279 was specifically engineered to withstand nuclear shockwaves with its unique hull and thick armor, while a British Centurion ("Atomic Tank") surprisingly survived a nuclear test at a distance, though its crew wouldn't have. Modern tanks like Abrams, Challenger 2, and Leopard 2 are built to withstand the blast effects and have NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) protection, but survival depends heavily on the weapon's yield and distance from the blast.Could a king tiger destroy an Abrams?
No, a King Tiger (Tiger II) would almost certainly not destroy an M1 Abrams in a fair fight; the Abrams has vastly superior technology, including thermal sights, laser rangefinders, and much faster, more accurate fire, while the Tiger's powerful gun struggles to penetrate the Abrams' frontal armor, though it could score a mobility kill by hitting the tracks or rear. The Abrams' advanced systems allow it to spot, track, and destroy the King Tiger from kilometers away, long before the Tiger's crew even knows they're in a fight, making a direct confrontation a massacre for the WWII tank.Could a bazooka take out a tiger tank?
During the Allied invasion of Sicily, small numbers of the M1A1 Bazooka (using an improved rocket, the M6A1) were used in combat by U.S. forces. The M1A1 accounted for four medium German tanks and a heavy Tiger I, with the latter being knocked out by an improbable hit through the driver's vision slot.What is considered the best tank in the world?
There's no single "best" tank, but top contenders consistently include the US M1A2 Abrams SEPv3, known for upgrades against modern threats; Germany's versatile Leopard 2 (especially A7+); and South Korea's high-tech K2 Black Panther, praised for mobility and firepower. Other elite tanks often cited are Israel's crew-focused Merkava IV, Russia's advanced T-14 Armata, and the UK's upcoming Challenger 3, all featuring cutting-edge tech like advanced armor or active protection systems.What is a tiger's worst enemy?
Tiger Predators: HumansHumans are the biggest threat to tigers. To many people's surprise, some humans eat tigers. In Asia, tiger meat is an expensive delicacy. However, natives have more uses for several tiger body parts.
← Previous question
Is Malphite a juggernaut?
Is Malphite a juggernaut?
Next question →
How to tell if your MTG card is worth money?
How to tell if your MTG card is worth money?