Why was the T-35 tank a failure?
The T-35 tank was a failure primarily due to severe mechanical unreliability, a huge size making it a slow, easy target, thin armor, and a command structure overwhelmed by its five turrets, leading to poor combat effectiveness despite its impressive appearance in parades. Its drivetrain, clutch, and gearbox constantly failed, often leaving it stranded, with most losses in 1941 occurring from breakdowns, not enemy fire, making it obsolete even before World War II.Why was the T-35 tank a failure?
Often called a "land battleship", it was the only five-turreted heavy tank in the world to reach production, but proved to be slow and mechanically unreliable. Most of the T-35 tanks still operational at the time of Operation Barbarossa were lost due to mechanical failure rather than enemy action.What was the most unreliable tank in WWII?
VI Crusader was one of the primary British cruiser tanks of WWII, and perhaps the most important British tank of the North African Campaign. However, due to its reputation for unreliability and relatively thin armour, it was replaced by American tanks for the invasion of Italy.What was the worst tank ever built?
There's no single "worst tank," but strong contenders include New Zealand's improvised Bob Semple tank (impractical, unstable), the Soviet T-35 (mechanically unreliable land battleship), Germany's Panzer Maus (too heavy/slow), Japan's Type 95 Ha-Go (weak armor/gun), Britain's slow/flawed A38 Valiant, and even the M247 Sergeant York (futuristic but failed anti-aircraft system). These tanks were poor due to bad design, extreme unreliability, impracticality, or being outclassed in combat, often failing in mechanical or tactical ways rather than just being destroyed by enemies.Why were Sherman tanks so bad?
The Sherman tank wasn't inherently "bad," but it had significant flaws compared to late-war German tanks like the Panther and Tiger, primarily its thin armor and underpowered gun, leading to its notorious reputation for catching fire ("brewing up") when hit due to ammunition stored in easily penetrable sponsons, though its strengths in mass production, reliability, and numbers made it vital for the Allied war effort, as noted in Quora and this YouTube video.The T-35 Landship: 5 Turrets, 1 Colossal Failure | Cursed by Design
What tank did the Germans fear the most?
The German tank most feared by the Allies during World War II was the Tiger I (Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger Ausf. E), due to its near-impenetrable frontal armor, devastating 88mm gun, and the intense propaganda surrounding it, creating a legendary "fear factor" that often halted Allied advances even before the Tiger appeared. However, while feared for its power, the Panther tank (Panzerkampfwagen V Panther) was also highly respected by German tankers themselves, especially for its superior sloped armor and firepower, often cited by veterans as more effective in combat than the temperamental Tiger.Did Japan regret attacking the US?
Analysis and hindsight from historians over the years that have followed have led to a view that Japan regretted its decision to attack Pearl Harbor. In 2014, a biography on Emperor Hirohito revealed that the Japanese leader was wary of attacking the USA and that doing so could have consequences for his nation.What is the most feared tank ever?
The Tiger I is arguably the most famous tank of the Second World War. The impenetrable armour, powerful gun and huge size of the Tiger made it a legend in its time. It struck terror into the hearts of Allied tank crews when it first appeared in 1942.What tank went 104 mph?
In one public test 1931 in Linden, NJ, Army officials clocked a Christie M1931 tank attaining 104 mph (167 km/h), making it the fastest tank in the world: a record many believe it still holds.Was the T-34 better than German tanks?
The T-34 tank had a decisive edge over its German counterparts in World War II. With a 76mm cannon and 45mm of sloped armor, it earned the respect of its adversaries. By 1942, the Russians had deployed thousands of these impressive tanks. #T34 #tank #WWII #history #military #armor.What killed the most tanks in WWII?
The most effective tank destroyers in WWII were a combination of dedicated anti-tank (A/T) guns, often concealed, alongside tank-on-tank combat and air attacks, with a significant portion of German tank losses attributed to mechanical failures and poor maintenance, especially later in the war, rather than solely enemy fire. Allied firepower (gunfire, mines, rockets) and terrain also caused major losses, but hidden anti-tank guns proved deadly, while aircraft numbers were often exaggerated in initial reports.Which tank was better, Tiger or Panther?
While having essentially the same Maybach V12 petrol (690 hp) engine as the Tiger I, the Panther had better gun penetration, was lighter and faster, and could traverse rough terrain better than the Tiger I.What tank had the best armor in WWII?
1] Tiger 1 - 1942This was a formidable tank, showcasing superb firepower, engineering, and impressive armor. Its 88 mm gun was the most feared of WWII, and its armor was nearly impenetrable by most Allied tank rounds.
What did Germans think of the Churchill tank?
It criticized the Churchill as being weakly armed with obsolete, ineffective weapons, equipped with tracks that broke easily and armor plating of poor quality. However, only two of the 29 tanks were penetrated by the German antitank guns, despite numerous hits on many of them.What was the #1 killer in WWI?
By far, artillery was the biggest killer in World War I, and provided the greatest source of war wounded.What gun did the T-35 use?
The main gun of the T-35 was the 76.2mm KT-28, identical to the gun used on the early models of the T-28 medium tank. Later T-28s would have this gun replaced by the longer-barrel and broadly more effective 76.2mm gun L-10.Which tank has never been destroyed?
The Challenger 2 is a main battle tank, designed to destroy other tanks. It has been used by the British Army on operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Iraq, and has never experienced a loss at the hands of the enemy.Is T-90 better than Abrams?
The M1A2 Abrams and the T-90 are both advanced main battle tanks with impressive armor and defense systems: Speed The M1A2 Abrams is faster than the T-90, with a top speed of 72 km/h compared to the T-90's 60 km/h. Engine The M1A2 Abrams has a more powerful engine (1500 HP vs 1250 HP) than the T-90.How fast can a T-72 go?
The T-72 main battle tank generally has a top road speed of around 60 km/h (37 mph), though this can vary slightly by variant and upgrades, with off-road speeds typically lower, around 35-45 km/h. Some modernized versions, like the Czech T-72M4 CZ, can reach up to 64 km/h on roads. Its powerful engine allows for decent speed but acceleration can be slow, and its reverse speed is very limited, often only around 4 km/h.What tank did the Germans fear?
TIGERS I AND II: GERMANY'S MOST FEARED TANKS OF WWII < Mezzi corazzati - Veicoli militari < Milistoria.Could a 76mm Sherman penetrate a tiger?
Yes, a 76mm Sherman could penetrate a Tiger I's frontal armor, especially with HVAP (High Velocity Armor Piercing) rounds or at closer ranges with standard APC (Armor-Piercing Capped) rounds, but it was challenging and often unreliable, with side/rear shots being far more effective. The 76mm gun was a significant upgrade, designed to counter German heavies, but the Tiger's thick, sloped frontal plates (around 100-120mm) often absorbed shots, making flanking maneuvers crucial for Shermans in combat.What was Hitler's reaction to Pearl Harbor?
Hitler's reaction to Pearl Harbor was one of surprise, excitement, and relief, viewing it as a golden opportunity to solidify the Axis alliance and divert American attention to the Pacific, allowing Germany to focus on Europe, culminating in his declaration of war on the U.S. just days later, believing Japan's success against America meant victory was assured. He felt liberated, seeing the attack as freeing him from the need to wait for the U.S. to enter the war and as a chance to unite with an ally that "had never lost a war".Did Yamamoto actually say "Sleeping Giant"?
No, Admiral Yamamoto likely never said the famous "sleeping giant" quote, but the phrase captures his actual fears and sentiments that Japan could not win a prolonged war against the U.S. due to its immense industrial power, with the quote gaining popularity from the film Tora! Tora! Tora! despite uncertain origins and no definitive proof of him writing or speaking it.What did Hirohito say about Pearl Harbor?
Hirohito was alarmed by political leaders' intentions in the runup to the December 1941 surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, according to the biography, describing the prospect of conflict with the US as a "reckless war" that would make him "deeply sorry for my imperial ancestors".
← Previous question
What color is hex 000?
What color is hex 000?
Next question →
How to tell if a game is CPU-intensive?
How to tell if a game is CPU-intensive?